In the corporate landscape, there are cases of unethical behavior that are overlooked, and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, is a perfect example of the latter — a tale of presumed malfeasance that not only taints the reputation of a specific individual but throws doubt over the firm’s standards .

Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has held onto his title , appearing untouched by the turmoil surrounding him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? According to sources , Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with violations of the business principles, but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it evolved into a series of ethical breaches that has left coworkers disillusioned and stakeholders confused .

Throughout a leadership improvement workshop— ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly converted what should have been a serious training session into a spree of inappropriate episodes . Allegations indicate he spent business-funded trips engaging in flirtatious behavior , a glaring violation of Ventia’s business principles , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .

But the indiscretions didn’t cease at those affairs. One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to share suggestive pictures to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emojis to advice brag about extramarital affairs —paints a picture of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on repeated times during business days , despite his current marriage and her having a partner . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but tore apart homes—creating a trail of betrayal that extended outside of the business environment .

How can this behavior be enabled to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, lies in a problematic dearth here of accountability within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins continues unchecked .

This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that authority and prestige within the advice firm can protect individuals from consequences . It breeds a damaging work setting, disheartens staff , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .